Features
Use cases
Get recommended on
AI searches
Track and optimize your visibility in ChatGPT, Perplexity, Gemini, and other AI search engines to drive traffic to your website that converts.
Overview
How often each brand appears in AI generated discussions
Visibility
Last 14 daysTop Brands
| # | Brand | Visibility | SOV | Position |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Harborlight | 58% | 31% | # 1.6 |
| 2 | FieldnoteYou | 41% | 24% | # 2.1 |
| 3 | Quillspring | 37% | 19% | # 2.4 |
| 4 | Mossbank | 22% | 14% | # 3.1 |
| 5 | Driftwell | 15% | 12% | # 3.6 |
Top Domains
Pages the models retrieved before answering
| Domain | Share of citations | Citations | You |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rreddit.com | 128 | named | |
| Gg2.com | 96 | absent | |
| Ggithub.com | 74 | named | |
| Sstackoverflow.com | 61 | absent | |
| Pproducthunt.com | 44 | named |
Your visibility
14 day trendShare of answers naming you, one reading per day
Overview · the first screen after setup, on real daily runs
Asked every day, on every prompt you track
The shift
Ten links became one answer
Either your name is in it or your competitor's is. SEO had rank trackers to tell you where you stood. AI search had nothing, and you cannot sit and ask ChatGPT a thousand questions a week.
asked
One question, three engines, three different winners
Winner takes all
There is no page two of an answer. A model names two or three companies and stops. Everyone else was not ranked lower, they were left out.
It moves under you
Models recrawl, rerank and reword. The answer that named you in March can drop you in April, and nothing tells you it happened.
Nobody is watching
Rank trackers watch links. Analytics watch clicks. Neither can see the sentence that decided the sale before either of them was involved.
The product
Six screens that finish the thought
Most tools stop at the chart and leave the hard part to you. These read in order: where you stand, on which questions, in which answer, against whom, from which page, and what to do about it this week.
01 Overview
Where you stand
One number for the share of AI answers that name you, and the rivals it is measured against.
02 Prompts
The questions you are judged on
Real buyer questions, tagged by intent, each with how often you survive the answer.
03 Answers
The answer, not a score
Every collected answer in full, with who got named, in what order, and which pages it cited.
For a studio of that size, Harborlight is the most recommended, with Fieldnote a close second for teams that want white label branding.
04 Competitors
The gap, model by model
A rival can own ChatGPT and be invisible on Perplexity. One number would hide that. This does not.
| Brand | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harborlight | 71% | 64% | 55% | 62% |
| Fieldnote | 52% | 47% | 38% | 44% |
| Quillspring | 44% | 39% | 41% | 36% |
05 Cited sources
What AI reads first
The pages the models pull from before they answer, ranked, and whether your name is on them.
06 Get recommended
The work, in order
Not advice. Specific pages to publish, threads to answer and listings to claim, with a status you can move.
Answers
A score says you lost. The answer says why
Gleance keeps the full text of every answer it collects, so you can read the sentence that named your competitor instead of guessing at a percentage.
| Chat | Mentions | Sources | Position | Created |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Best client portal for a small design studio | 3 | 9 | # 2 | 4h ago |
| White label client portal recommendations | 2 | 12 | # 1 | 6h ago |
| Client portal that plugs into Figma | 3 | 7 | not named | 9h ago |
| Alternatives to a shared drive for client files | 2 | 5 | # 3 | yesterday |
Answers · every collected answer, filterable by engine and window
Named, and in what order
Being third in an answer is not the same as being first. Position is recorded on every mention, not just presence.
With the pages it read
Each answer carries the sources the model cited to produce it, which is where the next piece of work comes from.
Per surface, never averaged
The same question gets a different answer on each engine. They are stored apart, because that difference is the opportunity.
Competitors
One average would have hidden this
Harborlight owns ChatGPT and is beatable on Claude. You are strong where buyers compare and thin where they discover. That is a plan, and it only exists if the engines are kept apart.
| Brand | ChatGPT | Perplexity | Gemini | GPT-5 Search | Claude | Grok | DeepSeek | Average |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Harborlight | 71% | 64% | 55% | 62% | 49% | 58% | 44% | 58% |
| FieldnoteYou | 52% | 47% | 38% | 44% | 36% | 41% | 12% | 39% |
| Quillspring | 44% | 39% | 41% | 36% | 31% | 33% | 28% | 36% |
| Mossbank | 26% | 24% | 19% | 22% | 17% | 21% | 22% | |
| Driftwell | 18% | 15% | 12% | 14% | 11% | 16% | 14% |
Competitors · share of answers per brand, per engine
Get recommended
The part every other tool leaves to you
Measurement is the easy half. Gleance ends on a queue: the thread that keeps getting cited without your name in it, the comparison page four of your prompts are asking for, the listing your rival claimed and you did not.
Workstream
Owned content8Social amplification6Outreach12Status
NewIn progressCompleted| Priority | What to do | Channel | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| High | r/graphic_design: what client portal are you all using in 2026Cited in 14 answers. Names Harborlight and Quillspring, not you. | New | |
| High | Publish: client portal comparison for design studiosFour prompts ask for a comparison. No page of yours answers one. | Blog | New |
| Medium | G2: Client Portal Software categoryCited in 9 answers. Your profile is unclaimed. | Directory | In progress |
| Medium | Thread: how studios handle client handoffRising thread in your category. Two rivals already in the replies. | In progress | |
| Low | Sharing design assets with non technical clientsCited by Claude and Grok. Answer is four years old. | Stack Overflow | Completed |
Get recommended · the week's work, ordered by impact
Derived, not authored
Every row is traced back to a real answer and the page it cited. If nothing was measured, nothing is suggested.
Ranked by what it moves
High means that source is feeding answers you are losing right now, not that it is generally good practice.
Something you can hand over
A status per row, so the work can move through a person, a freelancer or an agency without a second tracker.
Getting started
Five minutes today, five seconds a day after
No prompt writing, no keyword research, no onboarding call. You give us a URL and correct what we got wrong.
Paste your website
We read it and propose what you sell, who you compete with and the questions your buyers ask. Five short screens, and every suggestion is editable.
Competitors we found
We ask, you sleep
Every prompt goes to every surface once a day. Nothing to schedule, nothing to run, no browser to leave open.
350 answers collected, 1,104 citations read
Read one screen, do one thing
Your first report lands the next morning: where you stand, what changed, and the single highest impact thing to do about it.
Visibility this week
41%+15 pts
Do this first
Under the hood
What runs while you sleep
You will never write a prompt, open a browser or ask a model anything. This is the part of the product you are meant to forget about, which is exactly why it is worth reading once.
Ask
Every tracked prompt goes to all seven surfaces. Three are driven in a real browser session, logged out, so the answer is the one your customer would get rather than the one an API returns.
Read
The answer is captured in full, along with the pages it cited. Where an engine hides its sources behind a dialog we record the answer and mark the citations unavailable instead of inventing them.
Attribute
Brands are matched inside the text in the order the model named them, so a mention carries a position. Yours, your rivals, and anyone new who turns up in your category.
Roll up
Each day is stored per prompt and per surface, never averaged in advance. That is what lets a filter narrow to one engine, one week or one competitor and still be telling the truth.
06:00UTC
One scheduled run a day, every project
7surfaces
Asked for every prompt you track
350answers
Collected daily on the smallest plan
100%kept
Answer text and citations, stored whole
Who it is for
Built for the businesses the enterprise tools skipped
The studio, the agency, the local firm, the small software team. The ones who feel the answer change and have nobody on staff to explain it.
Pricing
Simple pricing for becoming the Answer
Track and improve your project's visibility across every AI search engine. Every plan starts with a 7-day free trial. No contracts, cancel anytime.
Starter
For the owner getting started with AI search visibility.
7-day free trial, cancel anytime
- Track 50 prompts
- Choose 3 models
ChatGPT
Gemini
GPT-5 Search
Perplexity
Claude
DeepSeek
Grok
- Daily tracking frequency
- 1 project
- Unlimited users
- Country and language targeting
Growth
Most popularFor businesses serious about becoming the answer.
7-day free trial, cancel anytime
- Track 150 prompts
- Choose 3 models
ChatGPT
Gemini
GPT-5 Search
Perplexity
Claude
DeepSeek
Grok
- Daily tracking frequency
- 3 projects
- Unlimited users
- Country and language targeting
- Competitor tracking
- Export data (CSV)
Scale
For agencies and teams tracking at scale.
7-day free trial, cancel anytime
- Track 350 prompts
- Choose 3 models
ChatGPT
Gemini
GPT-5 Search
Perplexity
Claude
DeepSeek
Grok
- Daily tracking frequency
- 5 projects
- Unlimited users
- Country and language targeting
- Competitor tracking
- Export data (CSV)
- API access
Enterprise
For global brands that need full coverage and support.
Tailored to your coverage and volume
Talk to usCustom terms, no contract
- Custom prompt volume
- Choose any model
ChatGPT
Gemini
GPT-5 Search
Perplexity
Claude
DeepSeek
Grok
- Daily tracking frequency
- Unlimited projects
- Unlimited users
- Country and language targeting
- Competitor tracking
- Export data (CSV)
- API access
- Single sign-on (SSO)
- Priority support
Prices in USD. Every plan includes a 7-day free trial. Cancel anytime, no contract.
Questions
What people ask before they start
Including the three we would rather not answer, answered anyway.
What gets measured
Seven surfaces: ChatGPT, Perplexity and Gemini read in a browser the way a logged out customer reads them, plus GPT-5 Search, Claude, Grok and DeepSeek through their own APIs. Every paid plan tracks the three engines you choose, and Enterprise unlocks all of them.
Because we cannot read it reliably yet. Google serves an interstitial to automated traffic instead of results, which would put silent holes in your charts on the days it refused. We would rather be one engine short than quietly wrong, and Google goes in the moment it can be tracked properly.
One real buyer question we put to every engine, every day, such as best client portal for a design studio or accountant for contractors in Leeds. Fifty prompts across seven surfaces is 350 answers collected for you a day.
Once a day, at 06:00 UTC, for every project. Nothing to schedule and nothing to trigger. Your report is waiting before you open your laptop.
Reading the numbers
The share of collected answers that name your brand, for the prompts you track, on the engines you selected, in the window you are looking at. It is a percentage of answers, not of traffic, and every reading is traceable back to the answers behind it.
DeepSeek does not search the web. It answers from what it absorbed in training and cites nothing, so its readings tell you what the model remembers about you rather than what AI is currently citing. We label it that way instead of blending it into one average.
No, and be careful of anyone who says it can. Answers usually happen without a click, and the click that does come often arrives with no useful referrer. What Gleance proves is presence: whether the answer named you, in what position, against whom, and which page it read to decide.
A rank tracker watches ten blue links on a page most buyers no longer scroll. Gleance watches the answer that replaced it, where there is no position four, no page two, and being named at all is the whole game.
Using it
No. You paste your website, we read it and propose your category, your competitors and your prompts, and you correct whatever we got wrong. From then on you read one screen and act on one instruction.
Both, and the second half is the point. Every run ends in a queue of specific work: the thread that keeps getting cited without you in it, the comparison page your prompts are asking for, the directory listing a rival claimed. Each row is traced back to the answer that produced it.
Yes. Projects are separate, each with its own competitors, prompts and report, so an agency can watch every client side by side under one login. Starter covers one project, Growth three, Scale five, Enterprise unlimited.
Your first answers land the morning after setup, so you know where you stand on day one. Trends need a week or two of daily runs before they mean anything, which is why the trial is built around getting you that first real report fast.
Don't go unseen.
Your first run lands tomorrow morning at 06:00 UTC. Seven engines, every prompt you track, and the one thing to do about what they said.
7 day trial · no call · cancel from the dashboard